Laolu Akande, a former spokesperson for Vice President Yemi Osinbajo, has urged former President Olusegun Obasanjo to refrain from ridiculing other presidents. Akande emphasized that Nigeria’s political issues are deeply rooted in leadership problems, which require thoughtful solutions rather than public mockery.
Akande’s statement comes after Obasanjo referred to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu as “baba go-slow,” a term suggesting sluggishness in decision-making. The remark was made during a lecture at the Chinua Achebe Leadership Forum at Yale University, where Obasanjo also expressed strong disapproval of Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, describing them as a sham. The former president accused the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) of undermining the integrity of the process by allegedly compromising the use of the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS).
Speaking on Channels TV’s program Inside Sources, Akande provided a broader perspective on the issues plaguing Nigeria. He argued that while Nigeria faces significant political challenges, these are symptoms of a more profound crisis of leadership that has persisted over the years.
Akande stated:
“On Inside Sources yesterday, we took the view during the segment MY TAKE that former presidents such as General Obasanjo should do better than merely making jest of other presidents. The Nigerian situation suffers from political leadership challenges, but even more serious is the deeper problem that itself produces the political leadership challenges.”
This perspective highlights the need for responsible and constructive engagement from elder statesmen like Obasanjo, who have held positions of power and influence. Akande believes that their role should be to guide and inspire solutions rather than contribute to public ridicule, which he says does little to address the country’s core issues.
Obasanjo, known for his outspoken nature, did not hold back during his lecture at Yale. He described the 2023 elections as a “travesty,” pointing fingers at INEC for allegedly failing to conduct free, fair, and credible polls. His dissatisfaction with the electoral process and its outcome reflects a sentiment shared by many Nigerians, especially opposition parties and civil society groups, who have raised questions about the transparency of the process.
The former president’s criticism of Tinubu’s administration as “baba go-slow” has added fuel to the ongoing discourse about the pace and effectiveness of the current government. While some view Obasanjo’s comments as a wake-up call for Tinubu, others see them as unhelpful and potentially divisive, particularly in a nation already grappling with political polarization.
Akande’s remarks point to a critical issue: the weight of words from national leaders. Former presidents hold a unique position of authority and respect. Their opinions can influence public perception and political discourse, both positively and negatively. Akande appears to be calling for restraint and responsibility, arguing that constructive criticism is more beneficial than sarcasm or derision.
The former vice-presidential aide’s comments also underline the importance of unity and collaboration among Nigeria’s political elite. For a country facing numerous challenges, from economic instability to security threats, petty squabbles and public mockery can distract from the pressing need to find solutions.
Akande’s assertion that Nigeria’s problems go beyond leadership crises sheds light on the systemic challenges the country faces. Political leadership, while critical, is often a reflection of deeper societal issues, including weak institutions, corruption, and a lack of accountability. These factors contribute to the recurrent challenges in governance, regardless of who is in power.
The cycle of leadership failures can also be linked to the quality of the electoral process. Obasanjo’s critique of INEC and the 2023 elections touches on this point. If the electoral system lacks integrity, it becomes difficult to produce leaders who can genuinely represent the will of the people and address the nation’s challenges effectively.
Akande’s call for Obasanjo to adopt a more constructive approach is not merely a personal admonition but a broader appeal for better political dialogue in Nigeria. The nation needs its elder statesmen and women to act as voices of reason and pillars of wisdom. Their criticisms, when necessary, should be aimed at fostering growth and unity rather than deepening divisions.
This responsibility also extends to current leaders, who must be willing to listen to constructive feedback and engage with critics in meaningful ways. The goal should always be to improve governance and deliver tangible results for the Nigerian people.
Obasanjo, as a two-time leader of Nigeria—first as a military head of state and later as a civilian president—has had a significant impact on the country’s history. His contributions to Nigeria’s development are undeniable, but his legacy also includes moments of controversy and strong-handed governance. Given this, his words carry significant weight and can either inspire progress or provoke unnecessary conflict.
Akande’s remarks suggest that Obasanjo, and other leaders in similar positions, should use their platforms to mentor younger politicians, promote democratic values, and offer solutions to Nigeria’s myriad problems. By doing so, they can help strengthen the country’s democratic institutions and foster a culture of accountability and good governance.
For Nigeria to overcome its leadership challenges, all stakeholders must play their part. This includes current and former leaders, political parties, civil society organizations, and ordinary citizens. The focus should shift from blame and ridicule to collaboration and problem-solving.
While Obasanjo’s criticisms may stem from frustration with the current state of affairs, they need to be channeled into constructive actions. Similarly, leaders like Akande, who advocate for a more measured approach, must continue to push for dialogue that prioritizes the national interest over personal or political gain.
